I want to begin with a memory that is not mine but has been told to me many times. An old man, dying, calls his children to his bedside. He does not give them money. He gives each of them a single stick, and asks them to break it. They break the sticks easily. Then he hands them a bundle of sticks tied together, and asks them to break the bundle. They cannot. Whether or not it ever happened, the memory teaches what Ubuntu is — better than any definition does. Ubuntu and the Failed Project? The story is the answer.
What Ubuntu Actually Means
The most commonly cited definition: Ubuntu, in its most cited form, is captured in the Nguni phrase 'umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu' — a person is a person through other people. It names a worldview in which the self is not a fortress but a node in a network, and in which dignity, identity, and success are inherited from and accountable to community. It has shaped post-apartheid South Africa, modern leadership theory, and increasingly the way thoughtful organisations think about teams. That sentence is true, as far as it goes. It is also incomplete. Ubuntu is held inside a wider Bantu grammar — a set of related concepts, social practices, and proverbs — that the standalone definition cannot carry.
Sticks in a bundle are unbreakable.Bondei
The Question This Post Is About
A post-mortem in the spirit of Ubuntu. What it surfaces that other post-mortems miss. The question is worth taking seriously, because Ubuntu is one of those concepts that loses its shape when handled carelessly — and recovers it as soon as the reader is willing to slow down and listen.
Take a small, ordinary case. A team of nine. A project that was supposed to take a quarter is now in its second. The manager has the option to find a single person to assign blame to and to move on. The Ubuntu reading offers a different question: what did we, as a team, fail to make possible for the person carrying this work? Conflict between two colleagues is treated as a problem the wider team has not yet helped them solve. The case is not unusual. The reading of it, in the spirit of Ubuntu, is.
A Second Angle
Notice what the case is not asking. It is not asking who is to blame. It is not asking how to make the situation more efficient. It is asking what Ubuntu would have us do here, with these particular people, in this particular knot. Conflict between two colleagues is treated as a problem the wider team has not yet helped them solve. The discipline of asking the Ubuntu question — instead of the efficiency question, or the blame question — is what changes a working life over years.
Where the Concept Resists
There is a real risk in romanticising Ubuntu. The Southern African (Bantu) traditions that produced it have always also produced internal critics — voices warning against the misuse of communal philosophy to demand conformity, to silence the young, to protect bad behaviour by elders. The honest defender of Ubuntu keeps those critics at the table.
What to Do With This
What can you do with this? Begin small. Choose one place — one meeting, one relationship, one daily ritual — and run it through Ubuntu for a month. Not as a project. As a quiet experiment. Notice what changes. Ubuntu is not learned by reading; it is learned by repetition.
The full philosophy, as a book
The full philosophy of shared success — across leadership, conflict, accountability, and the digital age.
Read on Amazon