There is a particular way the word Sankofa arrives in modern conversations. It is invoked, often, as a slogan — pinned to a wall in a corporate office, dropped into a leadership keynote, printed on a tote bag. Sankofa in Action: A Workplace Story? The slogan version of Sankofa is easy to admire and easy to ignore. The actual concept, the one that has shaped Akan / Ghanaian life for generations, is harder. It demands more. And it is, I think, more useful.
What Sankofa Actually Means
Sankofa is an Akan word and a symbol — most often a bird with its head turned backward, holding an egg in its beak. The egg is the future; the head turned backward is the past. Together they teach a simple, demanding idea: it is not wrong, nor shameful, to go back and fetch what you forgot. The future cannot be built on amnesia. This much is on Wikipedia and in introductory leadership books. What is harder to find — and harder to translate — is the texture of the concept: the way Sankofa shapes a thousand small daily choices in a Akan / Ghanaian household, and how those choices accumulate into a different shape of life.
Se wo were fi na wosankofa a yenkyi.Akan — It is not wrong to go back for what you forgot.
The Question This Post Is About
A short, illustrative case study showing Sankofa reshaping a real workplace dilemma. The question is worth taking seriously, because Sankofa is one of those concepts that loses its shape when handled carelessly — and recovers it as soon as the reader is willing to slow down and listen.
Take a small, ordinary case. A team of nine. A project that was supposed to take a quarter is now in its second. The manager has the option to find a single person to assign blame to and to move on. The Sankofa reading offers a different question: what did we, as a team, fail to make possible for the person carrying this work? Quarterly retrospectives are not separate from planning — they are the first half of it. The case is not unusual. The reading of it, in the spirit of Sankofa, is.
A Second Angle
Notice what the case is not asking. It is not asking who is to blame. It is not asking how to make the situation more efficient. It is asking what Sankofa would have us do here, with these particular people, in this particular knot. Quarterly retrospectives are not separate from planning — they are the first half of it. The discipline of asking the Sankofa question — instead of the efficiency question, or the blame question — is what changes a working life over years.
Where the Concept Resists
It would be dishonest to pretend Sankofa is uncomplicated. The concept can be — and has been — used to suppress dissent in the name of harmony, to extract unpaid labour from women in the name of community, and to soften criticism that should have been sharper. Any serious reading of Sankofa has to hold these uses in view. The concept survives the criticism. But it is not innocent.
What to Do With This
There is no certificate at the end of Sankofa. There is only the slow accumulation of choices made differently — meetings shaped differently, relationships tended differently, decisions weighed differently. The reward is not visible. The cost is real. Over time the difference becomes a kind of life.
The full philosophy, as a book
How to use your history, your failures, and your traditions as fuel rather than baggage.
Read on Amazon