Three Ways to Understand Àṣà

Àṣà · Yoruba / Nigerian

Three Ways to Understand Àṣà? It is the kind of question that admits of two answers — a quick one and a true one. The quick answer is that Àṣà means tradition as living practice. adaptive wisdom rather than rigid rules — the things you do because they still work. The true answer takes longer, because Àṣà is not really a concept; it is a way of seeing.

What Àṣà Actually Means

Translators usually settle on something like: Àṣà is a Yoruba word for tradition, custom, or culture — but with a particular emphasis. Unlike a Western reading of 'tradition' as fixed inheritance, àṣà names tradition as practice — the continuous, adaptive doing of what has been found to work. It includes language, ritual, food, dress, courtesy, and the unspoken protocols of community life. It is the answer to the question: what do we keep doing, even as everything changes? It is a defensible translation. But translation is the surface. Àṣà carries underneath it a set of assumptions — about what a person is, what owes what to whom, and what success even means — that the English sentence cannot deliver.

A tree without roots cannot stand a storm.Yoruba

The Question This Post Is About

Three angles on Àṣà that, taken together, give you the concept whole. The question is worth taking seriously, because Àṣà is one of those concepts that loses its shape when handled carelessly — and recovers it as soon as the reader is willing to slow down and listen.

There is a specific application of Àṣà that managers rediscover every few years and act surprised to find: the practice of asking, before any consequential decision, who has not yet been heard from. The question seems procedural. It is not. It is a small Àṣà act, repeated, that changes the temperature of an organisation over years. Onboarding includes the company's living traditions, not only its policies.

A Second Angle

If you take Àṣà seriously at work, the first thing that has to change is the meeting. Not its agenda — its shape. Western meetings are optimised for speed and for the loudest contributor. Àṣà is optimised for something else: for the quality of decisions that hold. Onboarding includes the company's living traditions, not only its policies. The trade-off is real. Meetings under Àṣà take longer. The decisions also unstick less often.

Where the Concept Resists

It would be dishonest to pretend Àṣà is uncomplicated. The concept can be — and has been — used to suppress dissent in the name of harmony, to extract unpaid labour from women in the name of community, and to soften criticism that should have been sharper. Any serious reading of Àṣà has to hold these uses in view. The concept survives the criticism. But it is not innocent.

What to Do With This

There is no certificate at the end of Àṣà. There is only the slow accumulation of choices made differently — meetings shaped differently, relationships tended differently, decisions weighed differently. The reward is not visible. The cost is real. Over time the difference becomes a kind of life.