There is a temptation, when writing about a concept like Àṣà, to make it noble. To treat Yoruba / Nigerian thought as if it were uncomplicated wisdom waiting for the modern reader to catch up. Àṣà and Office Politics? The honest answer requires resisting that flattery. Àṣà is real philosophy. It has internal tensions. It can be misused. It still rewards close reading.
What Àṣà Actually Means
Translators usually settle on something like: Àṣà is a Yoruba word for tradition, custom, or culture — but with a particular emphasis. Unlike a Western reading of 'tradition' as fixed inheritance, àṣà names tradition as practice — the continuous, adaptive doing of what has been found to work. It includes language, ritual, food, dress, courtesy, and the unspoken protocols of community life. It is the answer to the question: what do we keep doing, even as everything changes? It is a defensible translation. But translation is the surface. Àṣà carries underneath it a set of assumptions — about what a person is, what owes what to whom, and what success even means — that the English sentence cannot deliver.
Àṣà ni iwà.Yoruba — Tradition is character.
The Question This Post Is About
The unsentimental reading: what Àṣà does and doesn't help with. The question is worth taking seriously, because Àṣà is one of those concepts that loses its shape when handled carelessly — and recovers it as soon as the reader is willing to slow down and listen.
If you take Àṣà seriously at work, the first thing that has to change is the meeting. Not its agenda — its shape. Western meetings are optimised for speed and for the loudest contributor. Àṣà is optimised for something else: for the quality of decisions that hold. Long-running traditions are audited every few years for whether they still serve their purpose. The trade-off is real. Meetings under Àṣà take longer. The decisions also unstick less often.
A Second Angle
Outside the workplace, Àṣà reads differently — and harder. In a household, it is not a leadership philosophy; it is a daily, sometimes irritating, set of obligations. The phone call you owe. The message you have not answered. The relative whose problem is now your problem because no one else is closer. Long-running traditions are audited every few years for whether they still serve their purpose. Àṣà does not let you opt out of these.
Where the Concept Resists
There is also the question of authority. Who gets to speak for Àṣà? The traditions in which it lives are old, plural, sometimes in disagreement with each other. Anyone — including the writer of this essay — who claims a definitive reading is overreaching. The careful reader treats every restatement of Àṣà, including this one, as one voice among many.
What to Do With This
There is no certificate at the end of Àṣà. There is only the slow accumulation of choices made differently — meetings shaped differently, relationships tended differently, decisions weighed differently. The reward is not visible. The cost is real. Over time the difference becomes a kind of life.